83.3 F
Charlotte Amalie
Friday, September 18, 2020
Home News Local news Trustee Wants to Prove GERS Investments Aren’t Bad

Trustee Wants to Prove GERS Investments Aren’t Bad

Nellon Bowry, director of the Office of Management and Budget, discusses the proposed FY 2018 Budget Wednesday with members of the Senate Finance Committee. (Photo by Onaje Simmonds, Legislature of the Virgin Islands 2017 Summer Intern)
2017 file photo of Nellon Bowry (Photo by Onaje Simmonds, Legislature of the Virgin Islands)

Trustee Nellon Bowry defended the V.I. Government Employees Retirement System’s record on return on investments during the board’s meeting Thursday, arguing that when politicians and residents say the problem is GERS’s poor investments they ignore the obvious – GERS pays out much more in annuities than it collects in contributions.

Bowry asked representatives of Meketa Investment Group, who were updating the board during the meeting, whether there were ways to demonstrate that returns on investments were not the problem with the system.

Meketa representatives Gustave Bikkeskakk and Leandro Gestino both said GERS investments had earned more money than 68 other retirement funds of similar size. Bikkesbakk said GERS investments were “very, very strong.” Festino said GERS earning were at the “top of the list” and provided a graph showing that GERS returns were higher than all the others.

Trustee Carol Callwood said everyone had to understand that GERS problems were not of investment but of the need for a cash infusion.

Advertising (skip)
Advertising (skip)

Bowry said a documented comparison was needed so GERS could say, “Here is the proof.”

According to GERS Administrator Austin Nibbs, 8,708 retirees are now receiving checks from the System. In the last pay day, $10.7 million was sent out. He said, since Oct. 1, $160 million has been sent out to retirees. In that time frame 230 retirees have been added to the payroll while 207 were deleted.

In recent months, expenditures for the retirement system exceeded incoming donations by $5 million a month, which would be dismal news for most retirement systems, but for GERS those numbers have actually seemed like a bright spot.

Callwood said at the board’s meeting that if that income/outgo balance stays that way, “We could survive longer.” Most monthly deficits had been $10 million or more for the months leading up to recent meeting, she said.

Chief Financial Officer Denise Jeremiah indicated the bright spot would not be there long, as the recent months had seen government agencies paying more into the system as they were paying up on arrears, and that is now finished.

Total collections in April 2020 were $19.2 million and disbursement for the month was $24.1 million, with the deficit being only $4.9 million. In 2019 the collection was $15.6 million. Most of the increase in April 2020 collections could be found in the employer contribution, which increased from $7.9 million to $11.1 million.

GERS net deficit so far this fiscal year is $62 million. At this point in 2019 the year-to-date deficit was $43 million. One area it is taking a hit because of COVID-19 are rents it collects from Havensight businesses. In April 2019 it collected more than half a million dollars from those businesses. This year it collected only $19,000. GERS has made some concessions to businesses who rent from it, but businesses are asking for more – full abatement from paying rent until October.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 COMMENT

  1. The reported call by Trustee Nellon Bowry for a written document on the GERS investments is a good sign. The report, which should be made available to the public, should focus less on comparison with similar small retirement funds and more on comparison with an agreed industry benchmark. The statements regarding poor investment decision making by GERS is likely influenced by investments in local business ventures. As such, the report should show investments, levels of return from each type/category of investment, and the decision making processes for types of investments. Oh yes, the report should be prepared by an independent firm, not a GERS fund advisor or manager.

    Discussions regarding the current status and future of GERS seem to focus on different issues at different times, making it difficult for those of us on the outside to get a complete understanding of the driving factors affecting the state of the GERS, and the relative contribution of each. If radical action is required to “save” the GERS, it would be useful to conduct a full review of the GERS and to make the report publicly available.

Support the VI Source

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall - we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. Our sites are more popular than ever, but advertising revenues are falling - so you can see why we could use your help. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. If everybody who appreciates our reporting efforts were to help fund it for as little as $1, our future would be much more secure. Thanks in advance for your support!

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

STAY CONNECTED

20,177FansLike
4,005FollowersFollow

FROM FACEBOOK

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Load more
Print Friendly, PDF & Email