Open forum: WAPA, Where Do We Go From Here?

WAPA offices on St. Croix
WAPA offices on St. Croix

Dear Source:

Yogi Berra, the legendary Yankee catcher, once said, “When you get to the fork in the road, take it.”

Like so many of Berra’s offbeat remarks, that one made people laugh —the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority is at a crossroads, and nobody is laughing.

WAPA’s future is hanging in the balance.

Advertising (skip)
Advertising (skip)
Advertising (skip)

The single most important question that must be answered in the upcoming senate hearings on October 1 is this: Is WAPA beyond the point of solvency on its current trajectory?

The answer to that question of course dictates the governmental steps required for a favorable outcome to our energy crisis.

According to a June WAPA schedule I reviewed:
WAPA’s projected operating loss in 2020 will be $43.1 million. WAPA’s projected total debt service payments are $32.4 million.

The propane conversion contractor VITOL alone is owed $97 million in fuel cost, operations and maintenance expense.
WAPA’s long- and short- term bond debt schedule exceeds $500 million.

There are other unfunded liabilities I am told, in the hundreds of millions.

Is the central government prepared to step in now with a debt restructuring plan to stabilize WAPA? If so, what is the plan?

If the VI Government does not or cannot provide adequate operating capital, WAPA could easily fall into receivership unable to pay its vendors.
Involuntary receivership would be a messy outcome and disastrous for the VI economy, rate payers, and our credit ratings.

Another possible option for consideration would be for the senate to draft legislation signed by the Governor to allow for a public-private partnership to be explored, with a goal of energy security, reliability, and affordable power for the benefit of rate payers.

Any future restructuring would undoubtedly need the support of the bond holders and requires careful examination by experts in this highly complex area of energy financing and bond securitization.

Privatization (a Public-Private Partnership) is not a bad word; it does not necessarily mean job loss for the approximately 600 employees of WAPA, and it does not have to be a career ending move for elected officials — if approached sensibly with community approval and support, WAPA included.

The website www.FEMA.ORG has a section under statutory and regulatory requirements for an entity seeking federal aid the applicant must be able to provide satisfactory IRS evidence that it is a non-profit organization. Thus, a for- profit run utility will not be eligible for FEMA recovery.

Given this fact, it might make sense to divide WAPA into two entities. One private and one public, and owned by the Virgin Islands Government. which would continue its FEMA eligibility in future weather disasters.

Hypothetically, if WAPA were split into two, it could transfer a large portion of its workforce to a company that’s primary function would be power transmission, pole and line maintenance, meter reading, billing, installation and maintenance of emerging wind and solar assets, and customer service and administration.

A private partner company could operate the plant and be solely responsible for power generation. This company would need to insure its plant and equipment through Lloyd’s of London or a like syndicate since it will not be eligible for FEMA monies.

To protect the WAPA employees in the private entity, the privatization legislation could provide that any sale of the plant assets must guarantee and be conditional upon the protection of the current jobs required to run the plant. Any adjustment to staff levels could be done through normal attrition, retirement, or early retirement incentives.

A for-profit company is of course run for maximum profit. How then do we protect the rate payers from investors or a company whose sole overarching goal is financial return since they would control the generating plant in a monopoly market?

The Public Service Commission (PSC) is the gate keeper. Currently, the PSC only has regulatory authority over rates. It can say yes or it can say no. However, it cannot hold WAPA accountable for decisions its board or management make, or with respect to its day to day operational decisions, the debt it acquires, or if a project goes over budget like the VITOL propane conversion project.

Any privatization legislation will likely require an expansion of the regulatory authority of the PSC specifically with respect to a private entity that owns the power generation plant. The goal would be to ensure compliance as a gate keeper and defender of consumer protection rights, and a staunch advocate for the rate payer.

PSC members need to be qualified non-political appointees with energy and financial experience as would board members in any new government-controlled entity.

Governor Bryan, the 33rd Senate body, and the Water and Power Authority have arrived at the fork in the road.

It is time for our elected officials to take the fork in the road seeking the best possible outcome for WAPA and the people of the Virgin Islands.

Energy security and affordability is transformational. It will bring healing, hope and renewed prosperity to our community and is achievable now with political leadership.

Filippo Cassinelli, St. Thomas

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Support the VI Source

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall - we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. Our sites are more popular than ever, but advertising revenues are falling - so you can see why we could use your help. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. If everybody who appreciates our reporting efforts were to help fund it for as little as $1, our future would be much more secure. Thanks in advance for your support!

Donate