81.7 F
Charlotte Amalie
Monday, September 26, 2022
HomeNewsArchivesPARKING WON'T BE ALLOWED IN LOT BY PERCY'S

PARKING WON'T BE ALLOWED IN LOT BY PERCY'S

The new policy on parking in the lot by Percy's taking effect today — Oct. 1 — causes me to raise some questions concerning decision-making and service to the public.
First, Planning and Natural Resources Commissioner Dean Plaskett states: "Parking should never have been allowed there in the first place. It is government land and was never meant to be used for parking." He then informs us that the land was leased to a tenant who "has not complied with an agreement with Planing and Natural Resources to develop the space."
My question: If the above is the proper sequence of events, and there are no gaps, then should it not be the tenant entreating and enforcing against trespassing, instead of Planning? Is there a revocation of that lease that the public doesn't know about?
Second, does any one in authority care about the critical situation regarding St. Croix's economy and the extent to which it is impacted further by the dwindling traffic and commerce between that island and the capital, St. Thomas?
That the seaplane shuttle's service between the two islands becomes even more critical in these times for sustaining minimal contact and commerce between these islands — with ferry service virtually non-existent any more, American Eagle out of the picture, jetliners of USAir, American, Delta, etc. no longer linking the islands, and so forth?
That with all of this, the Seaborne Airlines parking facility on the waterfront side of the highway accommodates a very small number of vehicles?
That parking in the GERS Building lot is certainly not the best deal in town (besides being farther away from the town center), as it does not even offer a grace period?
Finally, is it acceptable in the public's eye that a decision such as the one in question be left to any one individual? Wouldn't we be better served by an advisory committee (even if it is under the chairmanship of the commissioner)? Isn't it more likely that those on such a committee would advise: "Let's take a deep breath; let's at least consider some of these broader issues — such as St. Croix's survival — in the mix! Shouldn't we approach the non-complying tenant with a "win-win" option?"
Gilbert A. Sprauve
St. John

Editor's note: We welcome and encourage readers to keep the dialogue going by responding to Source commentary. Letters should be e-mailed with name and place of residence to source@viaccess.net.

Publisher's note : Like the St. Thomas Source now? Find out how you can love us twice as much — and show your support for the islands' free and independent news voice … click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Keeping our community informed is our top priority.
If you have a news tip to share, please call or text us at 340-228-8784.




Support local + independent journalism in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as accessible as we can. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. We know that informed communities are empowered ones. If you appreciate our reporting and want to help make our future more secure, please consider donating.