HomeNewsLocal newsUpdate: Jury to Resume Deliberations Friday in Fraud, Bribery Case of Calvert...

Update: Jury to Resume Deliberations Friday in Fraud, Bribery Case of Calvert White, Benjamin Hendricks

Benjamin Hendricks, left, and his attorney, Darren John-Baptiste, right, exit the federal courthouse Thursday. (Source photo by Kit MacAvoy)

Twelve Virgin Islanders are deciding whether to convict Calvert White, the former Sports, Parks and Recreation commissioner, and Benjamin Hendricks, his alleged accomplice, on charges of wire fraud and bribery.

The jury began deliberating at approximately 1:37 p.m. Thursday after hearing closing arguments from the U.S. Justice Department and from White and Hendricksโ€™s respective attorneys, Clive Rivers and Darren John-Baptiste. Deliberations will resume Friday.

Over the course of a week, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Conley said during closing, jurors had โ€œdelved deepโ€ into the world of greed, corruption and backroom deals. Conley said White had a duty to the people of the Virgin Islands but that, unfortunately, it wasnโ€™t worth much, โ€œas his loyalty could be bought for $16,000.โ€

Conley rehashed the timeline of events that led White and Hendricks to beย indicted by a federal grand juryย in January for allegedly soliciting a bribe equal to one percent of a federally funded $1.6 million contract to install surveillance equipment at DSPR facilities across the territory.

The government cited a Dec. 28, 2023, phone call recorded by its cooperating witness, David Whitaker, who owned the cybersurveillance company Mon Ethos Pro Support at the time. During the call, White asked Whitaker if heโ€™d had a chance to talk to โ€œBenji.โ€ Whitaker said he hadnโ€™t yet.

โ€œOK you gonna need to have that conversation and you need to do it sooner than later OK,โ€ White said.

โ€œThat call is how the scheme unfolded,โ€ Conley told jurors Thursday, with Hendricks as the โ€œmiddleman, helper, aider and abettor.โ€

Whitaker claimed Hendricks approached him on St. Croix later that day and told him to pay White $16,000 to ensure that the DSPR surveillance camera contract went to Mon Ethos. During a recorded call later that night, Whitaker told Hendricks, โ€œI just want to make sure I heard you right. He only wants one percent? 16,000?โ€

โ€œI told him 16,โ€ Hendricks replied. โ€œHe say โ€˜Benji I easier.โ€™โ€

John-Baptiste argued that there had clearly been conversations between Whitaker, White and Hendricks prior to that first call in December, declaring that โ€œsomething is missingโ€ from the governmentโ€™s timeline of alleged criminality. On the stand earlier this week, Whitaker acknowledged having known White and Hendricks prior to alerting the Federal Bureau of Investigation to their scheme, and Whitaker was already working with the FBI as aย cooperating witnessย in the agencyโ€™s investigation into former Police Commissioner Ray Martinez and Management and Budget Director Jenifer Oโ€™Neal.

Conley also reminded jurors of a Jan. 2, 2024, conversation between the trio at the VIPDโ€™s mobile command center during the Crucian Christmas Festival, during which White was heard showing Whitaker confidential bid documents from rival bidders and telling them not to take pictures.

Calvert White leaves the federal courthouse Thursday afternoon on St. Thomas after a jury began deliberations in the government’s wire fraud and bribery case against White and his alleged accomplice, Benjamin Hendricks. (Source photo by Kit MacAvoy)

โ€œI have seen people lose a job, seen people gone to jail over something like this,โ€ White said. โ€œIโ€™ve been doing this a while, and I know the less evidence you have, the better youโ€™ll be. So I hope you all got a photographic memory because I want you to take a look at this document.โ€

The meeting continued in the parking lot outside the mobile command center, where Whitaker asked White to โ€œjust let me know how you want me to get you the sixteen that we talked about.โ€

โ€œYeah, no it canโ€™t be a check or nothing like that,โ€ White replied.

After that meeting, prosecutors said, Hendricks told Whitaker to โ€œget him four going into the meeting,โ€ an apparent reference to an upcoming meeting of the V.I. Property and Procurement Departmentโ€™s evaluation committee. Later, Hendricks messaged Whitaker: โ€œ5k for C.โ€

โ€œNot 4,โ€ Whitaker confirmed. The two discussed how the payment should be made in a call recorded on Jan. 3, 2024, after which Whitaker wired $5,000 from his FirstBank account to an account belonging to Hendricksโ€™s company, A Clean Environment. He labeled the payment โ€œPartial payment for contract.โ€

โ€œWire sent for Cal,โ€ he texted Hendricks.

โ€œDoes this sound like someone who is โ€˜dupedโ€™ to you?โ€ Conley asked the jury Thursday, anticipating renewed claims from the defendants that Whitaker โ€” a convicted felon whom Rivers repeatedly called a โ€œcon man of the highest classโ€ โ€” had entrapped them.

John-Baptiste pointed to Whitakerโ€™s own testimony this week in which he admitted to planting listening devices in government offices, claiming it was at then-Commissioner Martinezโ€™s behest, which he then โ€œdiscoveredโ€ after being hired by the VIPD to sweep the buildings.

โ€œThatโ€™s what his modus operandi is,โ€ John-Baptiste said. โ€œThatโ€™s what he does.โ€

Throughout the trial, the prosecution made no secret of Whitakerโ€™s extensive criminal history, which included working with law enforcement in exchange for a dramatically reduced sentence in a sting operation against search giant Google. John-Baptiste noted that Whitaker โ€œhas felled greater people than who we have here in the courtroom.โ€

โ€œHeโ€™s a criminal. Heโ€™s a felon several times over,โ€ Conley acknowledged, adding that he was presented to jurors โ€œwarts and all.โ€ Conley told jurors that they didnโ€™t have to like Whitaker to accept his testimony, and he and trial attorney Alexandre Dempsey noted that Whitakerโ€™s checkered past was precisely why the government โ€œfloodedโ€ the courtroom with audio recordings, text messages and bank statements in making their case against White and Hendricks.

โ€œHeโ€™s still not likable,โ€ Conley said of Whitaker, โ€œbut his testimony fits with the other evidence.โ€

In arguing that White steered the contract award to Mon Ethos, the government attempted to show that he colluded with Whitaker to make the latterโ€™s bid more competitive across multiple DPP meetings without the knowledge of the departmentโ€™s evaluation committee. During one Jan. 8 conversation, White was recorded as saying he had โ€œno doubt in my mind, had I not get into this evaluation, SmartNet would have got this contract.โ€

During one Jan. 19 meeting, White texted Whitaker, โ€œLetting you know Iโ€™m watchingโ€ and โ€œMake sure you reiterate that cost can be decrease [sic] by reducing the number of drops/cameras.โ€

On Feb. 5, Whitaker called White while he was in a meeting with the evaluation committee that did not include bidders and coached him on how to make Mon Ethosโ€™s bid submission more attractive. One of the committeeโ€™s members was Kim Spencer, an evaluation supervisor at Property and Procurement, who the government called to the witness stand Wednesday. Spencer told the court that it was โ€œabsolutely notโ€ usual for a bidder to be on the line while committee members discussed contract negotiations with representatives from a user agency โ€” in this case, DSPR.

โ€œMs. Spencer is by the book and she would have shut this downโ€ had she known, Conley said Thursday.

Speaking to Hendricks after the Feb. 5 meeting, Whitaker said they just had to figure out how to bring the cost down.

โ€œYeah, I made a phone call to โ€ฆ an individual. Actually, one of โ€ฆ the Senators,โ€ Hendricks said. โ€œAnd he said โ€˜Benji, donโ€™t worry about it โ€ฆ. He said โ€˜Theyโ€™ll get it.โ€

On the stand this week, Whitaker said he did not know the identity of that senator.

White eventually emailed the evaluation committee to let them know that DSPR had accepted Mon Ethosโ€™s revised cost of $1.43 million, and the committee recommended that the contract be awarded to Whitakerโ€™s company on March 12, though it was never executed. Theย federal investigation into Martinez and Oโ€™Neal, in which Whitaker played a similarly central role, came to light the following June. Both subsequently resigned.

Ninety days after Whitaker wired the $5,000 installment to Hendricks, the same amount was deposited into one of Whiteโ€™s bank accounts. Asked about the three-month time difference Wednesday, FBI Special Agent Kiernan Whitworth began to say that their investigation revealed there is โ€œa beliefโ€ in the U.S. Virgin Islands, but the defense objected and jurors did not hear the rest of his statement. On Thursday, Rivers rhetorically asked jurors who would hold on to $5,000 in cash for three months without spending any of it and claimed that the FBI essentially cherry-picked from Whiteโ€™s bank statements.

Whitworth said Hendricks made a statement to the FBI in June 2024 and admitted to receiving $5,000 from Whitaker. He then agreed to call White to ask if Whitaker still owed him money.

โ€œYou had said something about sixteen thousand or whatever,โ€ Hendricks prodded.

โ€œYeah, yeah. Uh – uh – uh – uh – Iโ€™ll talk to you in person on that,โ€ White replied.

Rivers framed this exchange as a denial during Thursdayโ€™s closing arguments. Dempsey said White never denied anything on that call.

โ€œHe said, โ€˜come talk to me in person,โ€™โ€ he said.

After the parties presented their arguments, U.S. District Judge Mark Kearney gave jurors their instructions. After they were discharged to begin deliberations, Kearney denied the defendantsโ€™ request to dismiss the case on the grounds that the prosecution had not met the burden of proof. Though some pieces of evidence could be open to interpretation, Kearney said, a jury could reasonably decide to convict White and Hendricks.

Editor’s Note: This story was updated at 8 p.m.

Keeping our community informed is our top priority.
If you have a news tip to share, please call or text us at 340-244-6631.

Support local + independent journalism in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall โ€“ we want to keep our journalism as accessible as we can. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. We know that informed communities are empowered ones. If you appreciate our reporting and want to help make our future more secure, please consider donating.

Jobs - Click Here