84.7 F
Charlotte Amalie
Monday, May 27, 2024
HomeNewsLocal newsFishery Council Plans Separate Rules for USVI, Puerto Rico

Fishery Council Plans Separate Rules for USVI, Puerto Rico

Boundaries of the U.S. Caribbean Exclusive Economic Zone, divided into three areas to recognize their distinct nature and conditions.
Boundaries of the U.S. Caribbean Exclusive Economic Zone, divided into three areas to recognize their distinct nature and conditions.

The Caribbean Fishery Management Council approved plans to change the framework and restructure the agency which will differentiate catch limits and fishing regulations in Puerto Rico from the V.I.

Fishing limits and regulations have been identical and under the same council for both U.S. territories, but will now take into consideration aquatic ecosystems.

“This all started by a request from the fishermen to consider each island individually because they are different,” said Yasmine Velez-Sanchez, who manages The Pew Charitable Trusts’ ocean conservation work in the Caribbean.

“It’s important to understand that this sort of system helps lead to a style of management where leaders take the entire ecosystem into account when making fishing rules. The council is moving beyond a single species and is considering the interactions between fish and the ecosystem” Velez-Sanchez said.

The Comprehensive Fishery Management Plans were drafted separately for each jurisdiction. One for Puerto Rico, one for St. Croix and a combined plan for St. Thomas and St. John. (See Comprehensive Fishery Management Plan STX, Comprehensive Fishery Management Plan, STT:STJ) Within the structure created, each jurisdiction will have their own council and power to make changes and adjustments to policies. A process was submitted within the plans as to how adjustments can be made for routine changes as well as regulatory changes that requires implementation through the Federal Register.

Yasmine Velez-Sanchez of the The Pew Charitable Trust. (Photo from LinkedIn.com)
Yasmine Velez-Sanchez of the The Pew Charitable Trust. (Photo from LinkedIn.com)

“To us this is crucial because a more comprehensive management approach leads to … more abundant fish populations, more robust fishing businesses and coastal economies, and healthier ecosystems,” Velez-Sanchez said.

Each of the management plans account for numerous changes, but all current seasonal closures will remain the same.

Keeping the seasonal closures “means that fish-spawning aggregations remain protected, which allows for fish to be able to reproduce without being disturbed and that translates to more fish in the water and more fishing opportunities in the medium and long term,” Velez-Sanchez said.

Seven annual catch limits in the St. Thomas, St. John plans are set to zero and six are set to zero for St. Croix. All the islands would be prohibited the catch or procurement of all coral species, sea urchins, sea cucumbers, various species of grouper and parrotfish that are rainbow, blue or midnight colored. According to the plans Queen Conch would be a prohibited catch in St. Thomas, St. John but has a 50,000 annual pound limit set for St. Croix.

Continued regulations to prevent damage to coral were also put forth in the plans and would be up to the respective island’s council to manage.

The management plans for both V.I. jurisdictions states vessels must use, “only an anchor retrieval system that recovers the anchor by its crown.” This prevents the anchor from dragging along the bottom of the seabed. “For a grapnel hook, this could include an incorporated anchor rode reversal bar that runs parallel along the shank, which allows the rode to reverse and slip back toward the crown. For a fluke or plow type anchor, a trip line consisting of a line from the crown of the anchor to a surface buoy would be required.”

“Each island has a unique culture, economy, market demand and it made sense to consider all of those variables when making management decisions. The council is using both the best available science and fisher’s knowledge to establish management rules,” Velez-Sanchez said.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Keeping our community informed is our top priority.
If you have a news tip to share, please call or text us at 340-228-8784.

Support local + independent journalism in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as accessible as we can. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. We know that informed communities are empowered ones. If you appreciate our reporting and want to help make our future more secure, please consider donating.


  1. PR has been piggybacking on V. I. Catch numbers for years allowing them to overfish. PR waters are depleted of many species due their overfishing and business dealings with China. Our waters’ fish count is higher, and our waters are healthier in regards to fish species. Collectively, when our numbers are high, PR looks better than they really are. If PR numbers are low, then that reduces the fish catch for the VI fishermen. If each island is responsible for their own waters and catch numbers then one island won’t have to pay the penalty for other ones’ overfishing. Seems fair to me. PR might not be happy but they need to start thinking about their ocean’s future or their fishing economy will be a lost economy.