87.5 F
Charlotte Amalie
Monday, August 8, 2022
HomeNewsArchivesANOTHER 'NO' FOR MANDATORY CAR INSURANCE

ANOTHER 'NO' FOR MANDATORY CAR INSURANCE

Dear Editors;
Let's all hope the governor has the wisdom to veto the mandatory car insurance boondoggle being pushed by the legislature until it has been discussed in public hearings.
The legislature should never pass legislation which forces people to surrender property (money) without first being absolutely sure it is necessary. Being certain is what public hearings can accomplish. Being certain is where mandatory insurance fails the test. Who needs it? Does it accomplish its intended purpose? Is there a better way? We have lived for a decade without mandatory insurance. We have lived quite well without it. Why go back to forced "protection" payments?
Insurance doesn't save money overall. It makes profits for insurance companies. Have our legislators been approached by these companies? Sure they have. What company with a profitable product wouldn't want the purchase of that product to be made mandatory? It's a salesman's dream.
The legislature, except those voting against like Ms Gomez, should be ashamed of this scam.
Terry Conklin
St John

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Keeping our community informed is our top priority.
If you have a news tip to share, please call or text us at 340-228-8784.




Support local + independent journalism in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as accessible as we can. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. We know that informed communities are empowered ones. If you appreciate our reporting and want to help make our future more secure, please consider donating.

FROM FACEBOOK

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Load more
Dear Editors;
Let's all hope the governor has the wisdom to veto the mandatory car insurance boondoggle being pushed by the legislature until it has been discussed in public hearings.
The legislature should never pass legislation which forces people to surrender property (money) without first being absolutely sure it is necessary. Being certain is what public hearings can accomplish. Being certain is where mandatory insurance fails the test. Who needs it? Does it accomplish its intended purpose? Is there a better way? We have lived for a decade without mandatory insurance. We have lived quite well without it. Why go back to forced "protection" payments?
Insurance doesn't save money overall. It makes profits for insurance companies. Have our legislators been approached by these companies? Sure they have. What company with a profitable product wouldn't want the purchase of that product to be made mandatory? It's a salesman's dream.
The legislature, except those voting against like Ms Gomez, should be ashamed of this scam.
Terry Conklin
St John